I received an anonymous comment and here is my response. Here is a fine example when a person attempts to justify the subject by changing the context. Keep in mind the context of the article is the Jews entering Palestine through the door of war.
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post “The Truth—1947 of Israel.”:
Where are you getting your information? I suggest you read some ‘real’ historical books on the subject. You know … the real history.
You don’t have a clue. For example. Did you know that the original Israeli Jews were atheists? Did you know that most Jews who tried to move to Israel were prevented from getting into Israel by the British and were sent to camps in Cyprus, Germany and other places because the British didn’t want to upset the Arabs? Did you know that the British forbid the Jews to have arms and they had to bring in weapon parts hidden in agricultural crates? Did you know that the British allowed Arabs to have weapons but not the Jews? There’s lots more you don’t know.
There is no way you have read the truth. Three weeks is not enough time.
“You don’t have a clue. For example. Did you know that the original Israeli Jews were atheists?”
That is irrelevant to the context. Atheists, secular, or religious Jews still believe in the ldeology of Theodor Herzl concerning political Zionism, which is fueled through a patriotic attachment of heritage and culture.
“Did you know that most Jews who tried to move to Israel were prevented from getting into Israel by the British and were sent to camps in Cyprus, Germany and other places because the British didn’t want to upset the Arabs?”
Yes, I did know, there are pictures of the camps at the Holocaust Museum. The subject is irrelevant to the context. This took place between 1945 and 1948 before the partition and a few months after. This subject has nothing to do with the context of the article.
”Did you know that the British forbid the Jews to have arms and they had to bring in weapon parts hidden in agricultural crates?“
The anonymous commenter is admitting that the Jews intention was of war without even comprehending the context, after all why did they bring weapons in crates if their intention was of peace? Despite this fact, the Jewish Israelis possessed stronger arms than the Palestinians, if a person begs to differ then how did the Israelis win so much ground between November 1947 to May 1948?
“There is no way you have read the truth. Three weeks is not enough time.”
I visited Israel of three months not three weeks. Israel is a country of war, and control which is based on Fascism, not peace. Maybe the anonymous commenter would like to share with the readers why there are 400,000 Jews living in the West Bank? What is the intention of the settlements? Maybe Mr. Anonymous would like to share with us why does Israel use Custer bombs and White Phorphous Gas in populated civilian areas. How about explain the massacres that took place in Lebanon because of the tactics of the murderous IDF.
Those 18-19 year old kids of the IDF would not have a chance without their bombs and weapons of mass destruction. Sure, maybe Hamas hide behind the public, then bombs should not be used, instead send in the infantry. Oh, that’s right Israelis don’t want their boys to come back dead.
An Israeli or Jewish person who has a patriotic attachment can only justify the subject by changing the context. Israeli propaganda is falsehood, the truth is not spoken Israel. The same situation today as in the days of the Prophet Jeremiah, who taught that nobody would speak the truth in Jerusalem. Today the entrainment of the atmosphere of Israel is Fascism that prevents people from speaking the truth.
I changed the setting for comments, a person must have a Google account or use an open ID to comment. Anonymous comments are not aloud anymore.